VESTNIK
Bashkirskogo universiteta

RUSSIAN
ISSN 1998-4812

Archive | Volume 20, 2015, No. 3.

INTRAPERSONAL CONFLICTS AND ADAPTIVE RESOURCES OF THE INDIVIDUAL IN CONTEMPORARY RUSSIAN SOCIETY

Vestnik Bashkirskogo Universiteta. 2015. Vol. 20. No. 3. Pp. 1105-1108.
Azamatov D. M.
Bashkir state medical University
3 Lenin street, 450074 Ufa, Russia.
Email: azamatov1940@mail.ru
Valeeva A. S.
Bashkir state medical University
3 Lenin street, 450074 Ufa, Russia.
Khramova K. V.
Bashkir state medical University
3 Lenin street, 450074 Ufa, Russia.
Hasanova G. M.
Bashkir state medical University; Bashkir state University
3 Lenin street, 450074 Ufa, Russia; 32 Zaki Validi street, 450074 Ufa, Russia.

Abstract

The topicality of the research theme is due to the need of the philosophical research of problems of the intrapersonal conflict, which affects almost all the human activity processes. The aim of our study is to explain social determinacy of intrapersonal conflict as a source of violations of mechanisms of individual adaptation. Importance of research of the intra personal conflict is caused by existence of certain crisis phenomena in activity of the Russian society to which, including. In article try to prove that the crisis phenomena of modern Russian education are result of an aggravation created earlier and for the first time the arisen intra personal conflicts. Appeal to the philosophical essence of the conflict is justified by the understanding that society cannot develop steadily in a situation of constant conflict tension. Over recent years there have been drastic changes accompanied with increasing conflict situation in every vital social institution and life sphere of Russian society. In the context of a variety of real and continuously emerging new opportunities, the uncertainty of the future, the layering of historical traditions, social and economic instability and social unrest there is a violation of the adaptive abilities of the individual to the living conditions among representatives of different population groups. The time has come to lay down new worldview groundwork and thus special attention is being given to the search, identification and correction of intrapersonal conflicts. Therefore during research the universal presupposition of social conditionality of processes of emergence, course and permission of the intra personal conflicts. Without understanding the essence of the intrapersonal conflict as a special condition of the person and the associated sharp feelings it is impossible to predict the future of man and society. In our opinion, today it is important to ensure comprehensive and universal vision of intrapersonal conflict.

Keywords

  • • intrapersonal conflict
  • • society
  • • social unrest
  • • adaptation
  • • disadaptation
  • • competition

References

  1. Ahunova L. I., Hasanova G. M. Vliianie obshchestvenny`kh interesov i diskriminatcii narkozavisimy`kh na e`ffektivnost` antinarkoticheskoi` profilaktiki // Aktual`ny`e problemy` sotciogumanitarnogo znaniia: sb. nauchn. tr. Ufa: RITC BashGU, 2014. S. 142–149.
  2. Bakunin M. A. Izbranny`e filosofskie sochineniia i pis`ma. M.: My`sl`, 2003. 573 s.
  3. Vil`danov U. S. Chelovek v transcendental`no-filosofskoi` my`sli Vostoka: gnoseologicheskii` analiz. Ufa: RITC BashGU, 2006. 417 s.
  4. Galimov B. S., Vasil`eva I. G. Novy`e perspektivy` filosofskogo issledovaniia problemy` duhovnogo razvitiia cheloveka. Ufa: BashGU, 2001. 53 s.
  5. Dmitriev A. V. Konfliktologiia. M.: Gardariki, 2011. 320 s.
  6. Zdravomy`slov A. G. Sotciologiia konflikta: Rossiia na putiakh preodoleniia krizisa. M.: AO «ASPEKT PRESS», 2004. 223 s.
  7. Kozy`rev G. I. Vvedenie v konfliktologiiu. M.: VLADOS, 2009. 176 s.
  8. Kozy`rev G. I. Mozhet li vnutrilichnostny`i` konflikt by`t` kentavr-problemoi`? // Sotciologicheskie issledovaniia. 2006. №12. S. 122–126.
  9. Kochetov A. I. Kak zanimat`sia samovospitaniem. Mn.: Vy`ssh.shk., 2007. 287 s.
  10. Kurbatov V. I. Konfliktologiia. Rostov-na-Donu: Feniks, 2011. 445 s.
  11. Mnatcakanian M. O. O prirode sotcial`ny`kh konfliktov v sovremennoi` Rossii// SOTCIS. 2007. №6. S. 81–88.
  12. Miasishchev V. N. Leechnost` i nevrozy`. L.: Izd-vo LGU, 2003. 426 s.
  13. Ol`shanskii` V. B. Prakticheskaia psihologiia dlia uchitelei`. M.: Onega, 2009. 272 s.
  14. Smolentcev Iu. M., Porohovskaia T. I. Osobennosti moral`nogo otchuzhdeniia // Vestneyk Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 7. Filosofiia. 2005. №1. S. 55.
  15. Fromm E`. Psihoanaliz i e`tika. M.: Izd-vo AST – LTD, 2002. 568 s.
  16. Halin K. E., Climova Iu. V., Levkina E. V., Bogaty`reva N. A. Konfliktologiia. M.: E`kzamen, 2009. 237 s.
  17. Hasanova G. M., Vechko O. Iu. Kul`tura v e`pohu globalizatcii // Modernizatciia kul`tury`: idei i paradigmy` kul`turny`kh izmenenii`: materialy` Mezhdunar. nauch.-pr. konf. Samara. 2014. S. 200–203.
  18. Hasanova G. M., Guynullina E`. N., Hasanova A. N. Formirovanie psihologicheskoi` kul`tury` lichnosti studenta kak faktor profilaktiki narkoticheskoi` addiktcii // Mezhdunarodny`i` akademicheskii` vestneyk. 2015. №1 (7). S. 107–111.
  19. Sharonov V. V. Osnovy` sotcial`noi` antropologii. SPb.: Lan`, 2006. 192 s.
  20. Shostrom E`. Chelovek-manipuliator. Vnutrennee puteshestvie ot manipuliatcii k aktualizatcii. M.: Aprel`-Press, Psihoterapiia, 2008. 192 s.